<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Austin Web Designer - Adam Freetly - Latest Comments in Selling A GPL product is a bad idea</title><link>http://archgfx.disqus.com/</link><description>Web Design, Wordpress Themes, Music, and Randomness</description><atom:link href="https://archgfx.disqus.com/selling_a_gpl_product_is_a_bad_idea/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:35:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Selling A GPL product is a bad idea</title><link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/selling-a-gpl-product-is-a-bad-idea#comment-1517644</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I still pay the ten bucks though. I look at it as supporting the software and the development of it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;that's why I thought it worth it for x-chat.  it's just a shame i didn't realize the money didn't go to everyone involved.  It basically amounts to a suggested donation.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sunburntkamel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 14:35:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling A GPL product is a bad idea</title><link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/selling-a-gpl-product-is-a-bad-idea#comment-1517642</link><description>&lt;p&gt;PHP-Nuke does it as well.  To obtain the most recent version, you have to pay ten bucks to download it from the main site.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Of course you can also go to one of the hundreds of PHP-Nuke support sites and download it from there for free.  It is GPL'ed and can't be prevented.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I still pay the ten bucks though.  I look at it as supporting the software and the development of it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">drmike</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:48:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling A GPL product is a bad idea</title><link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/selling-a-gpl-product-is-a-bad-idea#comment-1517649</link><description>&lt;p&gt;yeah, I knew there was a lot of noise about it.  I didn't realize he didn't get permission from patch submitters.   :sad:&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sunburntkamel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 11:15:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling A GPL product is a bad idea</title><link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/selling-a-gpl-product-is-a-bad-idea#comment-1517643</link><description>&lt;p&gt;X-chat was free. The person compiling it then decided to make it a paid program. There was a lot of noise about it - &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xchat" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xchat"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...&lt;/a&gt; - hence the silverex version.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It was more it had to happen rather than might have happened.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 06:24:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling A GPL product is a bad idea</title><link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/selling-a-gpl-product-is-a-bad-idea#comment-1517648</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Not only that, but people's time is more valuable to some projects than others.  I understand wordpress enough to write specific bug reports and develop themes.  the same isn't true of hydraIRC or X-chat, nor will it ever be.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sunburntkamel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:11:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling A GPL product is a bad idea</title><link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/selling-a-gpl-product-is-a-bad-idea#comment-1517650</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Some people have more money than time, and some people have more time than money.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Mullenweg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:27:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling A GPL product is a bad idea</title><link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/selling-a-gpl-product-is-a-bad-idea#comment-1517655</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@mark - &lt;br&gt;cool, I suppose it was only a matter of time before something like that showed up.  nonetheless, x-chat was on my list of open-source projects I'd always meant to donate to.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sunburntkamel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:26:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling A GPL product is a bad idea</title><link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/selling-a-gpl-product-is-a-bad-idea#comment-1517647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As far as the marketplace itself, I completely agree.  As far as the licensing; I suppose you could wait for it to come to a head, but it'd be much better to start off with a plan that scales well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sunburntkamel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:48:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling A GPL product is a bad idea</title><link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/selling-a-gpl-product-is-a-bad-idea#comment-1517646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's silly to debate a marketplace like this, it will either work or it won't. Like everything Automattic does, we'll iterate based on feedback (we already have a few times) and more importantly based on usage.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Matt Mullenweg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:41:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling A GPL product is a bad idea</title><link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/selling-a-gpl-product-is-a-bad-idea#comment-1517652</link><description>&lt;p&gt;X-chat for Windows being sold. Yep. But you don't need to buy it: &lt;a href="http://silverex.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://silverex.org"&gt;http://silverex.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:07:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling A GPL product is a bad idea</title><link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/selling-a-gpl-product-is-a-bad-idea#comment-1517651</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cost-wise, yes, it's a bad deal.  I suppose the only advantage to buying a custom theme rather than custom CSS would be that the theme will be "supported".  Matt sees &lt;a href="http://wordpress.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="wordpress.com"&gt;wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt; bloggers as people who don't want to fiddle with cPanel or fantastico.  I don't think they mean to take advantage of them that way.  Nor do I think he means to put designers in the position of defending GPL abuse.  I think he's actually just not thought it through.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sunburntkamel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:36:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling A GPL product is a bad idea</title><link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/selling-a-gpl-product-is-a-bad-idea#comment-1517653</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To me, it smacks too much of taking advantage of &lt;a href="http://wp.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="wp.com"&gt;wp.com&lt;/a&gt; users who don't know any better, really. First, they charge them to do pretty much anything useful, and if you can't be bothered to learn a bit of CSS (which isn't that hard, really) they are going to charge you again.&lt;br&gt;If it were me, and I was in that sort of position, I'd be pissed.&lt;br&gt;Not to mention it doesn't take much of a leap to realize that cost-wise, you could set up the standalone wp if you're willing to learn it. Or heck, jump ship to blogspot.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrea_R</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:05:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling A GPL product is a bad idea</title><link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/selling-a-gpl-product-is-a-bad-idea#comment-1517654</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the idea of a marketplace will work well on &lt;a href="http://wordpress.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="wordpress.com"&gt;wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt;, I can even see it being useful for plugins (share this, etc).  It's a nice idea, to have a store that pays the designer/coder, and also gives the (&lt;a href="http://WP.org" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="WP.org"&gt;WP.org&lt;/a&gt;) community something.  The license will probably not matter to most designers, which is why Matt's GPL requirement is so strange.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sunburntkamel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:59:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Selling A GPL product is a bad idea</title><link>http://archgfx.net/blog/2007/geek/blogging/selling-a-gpl-product-is-a-bad-idea#comment-1517645</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you are right on the money.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Personally I think their business model is a bit bizarre.&lt;br&gt;But only time will tell.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think matt is hoping that most users on &lt;a href="http://WordPress.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="WordPress.com"&gt;WordPress.com&lt;/a&gt; will pay to get better themes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Like I said I really don't mind what the licence is a long as I get back the actual cost of the theme.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But this will benefit people who give away free theme.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Arpit Jacob</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:55:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>